https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Can You Sue Instagram for Addiction? Meta Agreed to Pay Up to $18 Billion, but the Science Is Still on Trial https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Možete li tužiti Instagram zbog zavisnosti? Meta je pristala da plati do 18 milijardi dolara, ali nauka je i dalje na suđenju https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Si può fare causa a Instagram per dipendenza? Meta ha accettato di pagare fino a 18 miliardi di dollari, ma la scienza è ancora sotto processo https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Kann man Instagram wegen Sucht verklagen? Meta zahlt bis zu 18 Milliarden Dollar, doch die Wissenschaft steht noch vor Gericht https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Можно ли подать в суд на Instagram за зависимость? Meta согласилась заплатить до 18 млрд долларов, но наука всё ещё на скамье подсудимых https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00¿Se puede demandar a Instagram por adicción? Meta aceptó pagar hasta 18.000 millones de dólares, pero la ciencia sigue en juicio https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00Peut-on poursuivre Instagram pour addiction ? Meta a accepté de payer jusqu’à 18 milliards de dollars, mais la science est toujours en procès https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00هل يمكن مقاضاة إنستغرام بسبب الإدمان؟ وافقت ميتا على دفع ما يصل إلى 18 مليار دولار، لكن العلم ما زال قيد المحاكمة https://legalsmart.media/can-you-sue-instagram-social-media-addiction-meta-settlement/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-13T10:31:11+00:00能因成瘾起诉Instagram吗？Meta同意支付最高180亿美元，但科学仍在“受审” https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Qatar Gives Its Lawyers a Bisht-Inspired Robe. Why Do Lawyers Wear Robes at All? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Katar svojim advokatima daje togu po uzoru na bišt. Zašto advokati uopšte nose toge? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Il Qatar dà ai suoi avvocati una toga ispirata al bisht. Perché gli avvocati portano la toga? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Katar gibt seinen Anwälten eine Robe nach dem Vorbild des Bisht. Warum tragen Anwälte überhaupt Roben? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Катар даёт адвокатам мантию по мотивам бишта. Зачем адвокатам вообще мантии? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Catar da a sus abogados una toga inspirada en el bisht. ¿Por qué los abogados llevan toga? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00Le Qatar donne à ses avocats une robe inspirée du bisht. Pourquoi les avocats portent-ils la robe ? https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00قطر تمنح محاميها روبًا مستوحى من البشت. لماذا يرتدي المحامون الروب أصلًا؟ https://legalsmart.media/qatar-lawyers-new-uniform-bisht-court-dress/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-13T10:31:07+00:00卡塔尔为律师推出比什特风格法袍：律师为什么要穿法袍？ https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00“300 Times Hiroshima”: We Traced the Italian Uranium Headline to a Court File. Here Is What It Really Says https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00„300 puta Hirošima“: pratili smo italijanski naslov o uranijumu do sudskog spisa. Evo šta zaista piše https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00“300 volte Hiroshima”: abbiamo seguito il titolo sull’uranio fino a un fascicolo giudiziario. Ecco cosa dice davvero https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00„300-mal Hiroshima“: Wir haben die italienische Uran-Schlagzeile bis in eine Gerichtsakte verfolgt. Das steht wirklich darin https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00«300 Хиросим»: мы проследили итальянский заголовок об уране до судебного дела. Вот что в нём на самом деле https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00“300 veces Hiroshima”: rastreamos el titular italiano sobre el uranio hasta un expediente judicial. Esto es lo que dice realmente https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00« 300 fois Hiroshima » : nous avons remonté le titre italien sur l’uranium jusqu’à un dossier judiciaire. Voici ce qu’il dit vraiment https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00«300 مرة هيروشيما»: تتبّعنا العنوان الإيطالي عن اليورانيوم حتى ملف قضائي. هذا ما يقوله فعلًا https://legalsmart.media/300-times-hiroshima-depleted-uranium-italy-claim-explained/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-13T10:31:04+00:00“300个广岛”：我们把意大利贫铀标题追溯到一份法院卷宗，它真正说了什么 https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Nvidia’s Board Is Investigating Jensen Huang. What Is Proven, What Is Only Alleged, and Why a $4 Trillion Company Hangs on One Man https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Upravni odbor Nvidije istražuje Džensena Huanga. Šta je dokazano, šta je samo navod i zašto kompanija od 4 biliona dolara visi o jednom čoveku https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Il consiglio di Nvidia indaga su Jensen Huang. Cosa è provato, cosa è solo accusa e perché un colosso da 4.000 miliardi dipende da un uomo https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Nvidias Aufsichtsgremium prüft Jensen Huang. Was bewiesen ist, was nur behauptet wird und warum ein 4-Billionen-Konzern an einem Mann hängt https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Совет директоров Nvidia проверяет Дженсена Хуанга. Что доказано, что лишь утверждается и почему компания за 4 трлн долларов держится на одном человеке https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00El consejo de Nvidia investiga a Jensen Huang. Qué está probado, qué es solo una acusación y por qué una empresa de 4 billones depende de un hombre https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00Le conseil de Nvidia enquête sur Jensen Huang. Ce qui est prouvé, ce qui n’est qu’allégué, et pourquoi un géant de 4 000 milliards dépend d’un seul homme https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00مجلس إدارة إنفيديا يحقق مع جنسن هوانغ. ما الثابت، وما مجرد ادعاء، ولماذا تتعلق شركة بقيمة 4 تريليونات دولار برجل واحد https://legalsmart.media/nvidia-jensen-huang-board-investigation-proven-alleged/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:33:08+00:00英伟达董事会调查黄仁勋：哪些已被证实，哪些只是指控，为何一家4万亿美元的公司系于一人 https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00Iran Says Hormuz Will “Never Return” to What It Was. Can a Country Own a Strait? What the Law of the Sea Says https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00Iran kaže da se Ormuz „nikada neće vratiti“ na staro. Može li država da poseduje moreuz? Šta kaže pomorsko pravo https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00L’Iran dice che Hormuz «non tornerà mai» com’era. Uno Stato può possedere uno stretto? Cosa dice il diritto del mare https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00Iran sagt, Hormus werde „nie wieder“ wie früher. Kann ein Staat eine Meerenge besitzen? Was das Seerecht sagt https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00Иран заявляет, что Ормуз «никогда не вернётся» к прежнему. Может ли государство владеть проливом? Что говорит морское право https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00Irán dice que Ormuz «nunca volverá» a ser lo que era. ¿Puede un país ser dueño de un estrecho? Lo que dice el derecho del mar https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00L’Iran affirme qu’Ormuz ne « redeviendra jamais » ce qu’il était. Un pays peut-il posséder un détroit ? Ce que dit le droit de la mer https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00إيران تقول إن هرمز «لن يعود أبدًا» كما كان. هل يمكن لدولة أن تملك مضيقًا؟ ما يقوله قانون البحار https://legalsmart.media/strait-of-hormuz-law-of-the-sea-iran-oman-unclos/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:32:10+00:00伊朗称霍尔木兹海峡“永远不会恢复”原状。一个国家能拥有一条海峡吗？海洋法怎么说 https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Israel Is Readying Another Strike on Iran. Would It Be Legal? What International Law Says About Hitting First https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Izrael sprema novi napad na Iran. Da li bi bio legalan? Šta međunarodno pravo kaže o udaru prvi https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=itLegal Smart Journalit2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Israele prepara un nuovo attacco all’Iran. Sarebbe legale? Cosa dice il diritto internazionale sul colpire per primi https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=deLegal Smart Journalde2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Israel bereitet einen neuen Angriff auf den Iran vor. Wäre er legal? Was das Völkerrecht über den Erstschlag sagt https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Израиль готовит новый удар по Ирану. Будет ли он законным? Что международное право говорит об ударе первым https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=esLegal Smart Journales2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Israel prepara otro ataque contra Irán. ¿Sería legal? Lo que dice el derecho internacional sobre golpear primero https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=frLegal Smart Journalfr2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00Israël prépare une nouvelle frappe contre l’Iran. Serait-elle légale ? Ce que dit le droit international sur le fait de frapper en premier https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=arLegal Smart Journalar2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00إسرائيل تستعد لضربة جديدة على إيران. هل ستكون قانونية؟ ما يقوله القانون الدولي عن الضربة الأولى https://legalsmart.media/israel-strike-iran-preemptive-self-defence-international-law/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:31:16+00:00以色列准备再次打击伊朗。这合法吗？国际法如何看待“先发制人” https://legalsmart.media/us-measles-elimination-status-paho-decision-2026/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00America Is About to Lose Its Measles-Free Status. The Verdict Comes Next Week, and Europe Already Knows How It Feels https://legalsmart.media/us-measles-elimination-status-paho-decision-2026/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00Amerika gubi status zemlje bez malih boginja. Presuda stiže sledeće nedelje, a Evropa već zna kakav je to osećaj https://legalsmart.media/us-measles-elimination-status-paho-decision-2026/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00Америка вот-вот потеряет статус страны без кори. Вердикт — на следующей неделе, а Европа уже знает, каково это https://legalsmart.media/us-measles-elimination-status-paho-decision-2026/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00美国即将失去“消除麻疹”地位。裁决下周揭晓，而欧洲早已尝过这种滋味 https://legalsmart.media/nasser-hospital-strike-gaza-law-protecting-hospitals/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00A Strike on Gaza’s Nasser Hospital During a “Ceasefire”. What the Law Says About Bombing Hospitals, and What Niš Learned in 1999 https://legalsmart.media/nasser-hospital-strike-gaza-law-protecting-hospitals/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00Udar na bolnicu Naser u Gazi usred „primirja“. Šta zakon kaže o bombardovanju bolnica i šta je Niš naučio 1999. https://legalsmart.media/nasser-hospital-strike-gaza-law-protecting-hospitals/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00Удар по больнице «Насер» в Газе во время «перемирия». Что закон говорит о бомбардировке больниц и чему Ниш научился в 1999 году https://legalsmart.media/nasser-hospital-strike-gaza-law-protecting-hospitals/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:20:29+00:00“停火”期间加沙纳赛尔医院遭袭。法律如何规定轰炸医院，以及尼什在1999年学到了什么 https://legalsmart.media/trump-bbc-lawsuit-10-billion-panorama-edit-ruling/Legal Smart Journalen2026-11-12T09:19:48+00:00Trump v BBC: The $10bn Lawsuit Over 55 Missing Minutes Can Go Ahead. Here Is What He Must Now Prove https://legalsmart.media/trump-bbc-lawsuit-10-billion-panorama-edit-ruling/?lang=srLegal Smart Journalsr2026-11-12T09:19:48+00:00Tramp protiv BBC-ja: tužba od 10 milijardi dolara zbog 55 izbačenih minuta ide dalje. Evo šta sada mora da dokaže https://legalsmart.media/trump-bbc-lawsuit-10-billion-panorama-edit-ruling/?lang=ruLegal Smart Journalru2026-11-12T09:19:48+00:00Трамп против BBC: иск на $10 млрд из-за 55 вырезанных минут продолжается. Вот что ему теперь нужно доказать https://legalsmart.media/trump-bbc-lawsuit-10-billion-panorama-edit-ruling/?lang=zhLegal Smart Journalzh2026-11-12T09:19:48+00:00特朗普诉BBC：因“消失的55分钟”索赔100亿美元的诉讼可以继续。他现在必须证明什么